|
Date: December 14, 2006
From: "Ben Prew" <btp-a09SyBuiYrA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to:
<20061214222207.GA6683-dNnkglbcI8AYkl5+HhvCNA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References:
<200612011635.44839.shlomif@xxxxxxxxxxx> <17793.28509.439406.47451@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <20061214162427.GA62246@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <17793.33006.121678.100171@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <4ce365ec0612141020u20c4d72hac4d212f114e20d5@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4ce365ec0612141027w6c206358yb33ce53fded85980@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <17793.40618.674751.297239@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <4ce365ec0612141334y26037ce0g56c890433a25592e@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <24f4b2e80612141404j5e392987nf3f2a7eab17ef67f@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20061214222207.GA6683@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Apparently I need to read more before I go posting things ;). Josh
said that is was an operator, not a sub, which makes more sense.
And then Jay also remarked that m// did an implicit local $1 = $1,
which was my understanding as well.
So, everything is clear to me now, and I apologize for appearing
obtuse, if in fact I did.
Thanks
--
--Ben
| 
