Custom Search
|
Date: March 31, 2006
From: Paolo Bonzini <paolo.bonzini@xxxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to:
<442C474D.70908@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References:
<4426A87D.4070503@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <44278E4B.2070206@xxxxxxxxxxx> <442C474D.70908@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Mike Anderson wrote:
*sigh* I didn't realize there was an aclocal *as well* as an autoconf and automake. Considering that these things are supposed to build Makefiles, they take an awful lot of manual invocation.
autoreconf -fvi is your friend! Paolo
Date: March 30, 2006
From: Mike Anderson <gnu-smalltalk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to:
<44278E4B.2070206@xxxxxxxxxxx>
References:
<4426A87D.4070503@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <44278E4B.2070206@xxxxxxxxxxx>
*sigh* I didn't realize there was an aclocal *as well* as an autoconf and automake. Considering that these things are supposed to build Makefiles, they take an awful lot of manual invocation. Mike
Date: March 27, 2006
From: "QUAZI HOSSAIN" <quazi_hossain6@xxxxxxxxx>
SOLICITING FOR INVESTMENT PARTNER. Dear Friend, Compliments and Greetings. I have been searching for a person whom we can jointly invest Trust in and also solicit an honourable partnership with. I want to confirm that your contact information was retrieved after a very complex and tidious process. I represent a client and my client has interest to do business relating to investments in your country in areas related to agriculture or any business of your choice, to initiate a proper and structured relationship: Please let me know what your response will be to an offer to receive investment funds in cash if: 1. The said fund amounts to thirty-Eight Million, Five hundred Thousand,(38,500.000.00) UNITED STATES DOLLARS. 2. The said fund is in cash and needs to be transferred in the same state, due to restrictive banking laws in the territory where the fund is presently secured in cash. The banking laws do not permit deposit of an amount in excess of Ten Thousand Dollars so there is not way that the fund can be banked. 3. The fund could be invested through your agency in the purchase of facility and assets for investment purposes within your country, in collaboration with the agency of the current brokers. 4. This transaction will result in you being paid a commission of 10% off the investment capital. 5. The fund owners desire absolute confidentiality and professionalism in the handling of this matter, due to risks of seizure of the fund and litigation if personality is revealed. The fund owners have interest to invest in any of the following industries, depending on which is most not transparent, low risk, and average profit yielding- Power Generation, Telecommunication and Software Development, Hardware Manufacturing and Export, Construction or Real-Estate Development. Based upon the information provided above, I would like to know if you shall be able to assist in the nature of managing the investment fund. You must note that the fund can only be transferred in cash, therefore if you are in acceptance to participate with us in the investment of the fund, you shall also need to participate with us in the transfer of the fund in cash in the manner of receiving the fund in cash and depositing it in a Trust account opened in favour of the investment to be established. And this account would serve as the base or operating account for the investment. I am obliged to believe that you would be able to understand the information above, and should you need further information, please do not hesitate to ask. Kindly confirm receipt of this email by sending all correspondence to quazihssan@xxxxxxxxxxxx Telephone +871.763.591.465,Fax+871763591466. Thanks in anticipation of your co-operation. Yours Sincerely, Hossain Quazi Email.......quazihossain1@xxxxxxxxx telephone......+871.763.591.465,Fax+871763591466.
Date: March 27, 2006
From: Paolo Bonzini <paolo.bonzini@xxxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to:
<4426A87D.4070503@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References:
<4426A87D.4070503@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Mike Anderson wrote:
Hi, If I check out from the dev branch (ie. tla get .../smalltalk--devo--2.2), I don't get any of the aclocal.m4 files, nor various others.
You need the autotools to use the repository.
I've merrily copied those that autoconf and automake complain about from the smalltalk-2.2 tarball (hm. maybe the smalltalk-2.1h tarball would be better?), but I don't know what else is required and what is necessary.
The 2.2 versions are fine, the only changes should be the version numbers. Paolo
Date: March 26, 2006
From: Mike Anderson <gnu-smalltalk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Hi, If I check out from the dev branch (ie. tla get .../smalltalk--devo--2.2), I don't get any of the aclocal.m4 files, nor various others. I've merrily copied those that autoconf and automake complain about from the smalltalk-2.2 tarball (hm. maybe the smalltalk-2.1h tarball would be better?), but I don't know what else is required and what is necessary. Regards, Mike
Date: March 20, 2006
From: Robert Collins <robertc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
float.st fails in the build I've just done of Paolo's latest commits. Rob -- GPG key available at: <http://www.robertcollins.net/keys.txt>.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ help-smalltalk mailing list help-smalltalk@xxxxxxx http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/help-smalltalk
Date: March 19, 2006
From: Robert Collins <robertc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to:
<20060111012932.GC429@xxxxxxxxxx>
References:
<200601101309.06757.dg@xxxxxxxxxxx> <20060111012932.GC429@xxxxxxxxxx>
On Tue, 2006-01-10 at 17:29 -0800, Brett Cundal wrote: > On Tue, Jan 10, 2006 at 01:09:03PM +0000, David Given wrote: > > Does anyone know what's happened to the Debian packages for GNU Smalltalk? > > There certainly *used* to be packages (because I used them), but they seem > > to > > have vanished. > > > > I'm working on a 2.1 package that is mostly ready... Now that the arch > build requirements for testing have been relaxed, it may actually get > into testing. > > I had a quick stab at packaging 2.2, and it looks like it will require > a ton of work (it will require -lib/-dev packages to be built)... Surely we can skip those in the first instance: theres no requirement to install all the headers and stati libraries, we can choose to just install: * the library * the modules * the *.st files * gst itself and strip * *.h * *.la * *.a - sure the library wont be usable by other packages immediately, but we'd get to find out about build problems, and perhaps look at how we can build a gnu-smalltalk-gtk ( using blox-gtk) version for folk that want that (I do) as as as gnu-smalltalk-tk for the tk folk, without doing a full rebuild. Perhaps Paolo will have some ideas on that. Rob -- GPG key available at: <http://www.robertcollins.net/keys.txt>.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ help-smalltalk mailing list help-smalltalk@xxxxxxx http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/help-smalltalk
Date: March 19, 2006
From: Robert Collins <robertc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
=== modified file 'a/gtk/cpp.awk'
--- a/gtk/cpp.awk
+++ b/gtk/cpp.awk
@@ -93,6 +93,10 @@
next
}
+in_ifndef("GDK_PIXBUF_ENABLE_BACKEND") {
+ next
+}
+
in_ifdef("__cplusplus") {
next
}
Cheers,
Rob
--
GPG key available at: <http://www.robertcollins.net/keys.txt>.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ help-smalltalk mailing list help-smalltalk@xxxxxxx http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/help-smalltalk
Date: March 19, 2006
From: Robert Collins <robertc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
I am having trouble building the gtk module in 2.2-unstable: three issues so far. *) sometimes order.st emits garbage to the top of 'order' - smalltalk walkbacks and a error 'module (gst-gtk) failed to load'. Seems to me this should go to stderr which would address this, or we should use a module-less image always to process order.st. *) When such garbage is in the header, my gnu awk is dying with an invalid free - tickling the glibc invalid free detection. *) Having addressed that I now get another gawk failure: <approx 30 lines of sanitised output> typedef int GPid; G_END_DECLS gawk: node.c:515: unref: Assertion `(tmp->flags & 4096) != 0' failed. my gawk version is : 3.1.5 (-1 is the debian version suffix). Anyone have success with this with gawk 3.1.5 ? Rob -- GPG key available at: <http://www.robertcollins.net/keys.txt>.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ help-smalltalk mailing list help-smalltalk@xxxxxxx http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/help-smalltalk
Date: March 19, 2006
From: Robert Collins <robertc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
=== modified file 'a/Makefile.am' --- a/Makefile.am +++ b/Makefile.am @@ -28,7 +28,7 @@ if ENABLE_DISASSEMBLER SUBDIRS += opcode endif -SUBDIRS += libgst i18n tcp examples blox-tk . doc gtk tests +SUBDIRS += libgst i18n tcp examples blox-tk . gtk tests doc ########################################################### It doesn't make sense to me to build doc [which may need texinfo etc] until the rest has built successfully. Cheers, Rob -- GPG key available at: <http://www.robertcollins.net/keys.txt>.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ help-smalltalk mailing list help-smalltalk@xxxxxxx http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/help-smalltalk
Date: March 18, 2006
From: Robert Collins <robertc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to:
<432EA879.7080709@xxxxxxxxxxx>
References:
<431AAB27.8020903@xxxxxxxxxxx> <20050904181205.82052.qmail@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20050906221825.GD18906@xxxxxxxxxx> <432E86FA.6040706@xxxxxxxxxxx> <6647dab505091903387c26206@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <432EA179.4070705@xxxxxxxxxxx> <6647dab505091904447f7a0533@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <432EA879.7080709@xxxxxxxxxxx>
On Mon, 2005-09-19 at 14:00 +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote: > Bruce Badger wrote: > > >On 9/19/05, Paolo Bonzini <paolo.bonzini@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > >>It strikes me as absurd that you cannot make a decision to discard an > >>architecture if you want your package to enter Debian. > >> > >>Particularly when almost everybody using m68k is using uClibc or similar. > >> > >> > > > >However, the cross compiling often throws up things that really ought > >to be fixed anyway, so getting the code to work on all architectures > >is probably good for all architectures. > > > > > > > So the problem with m68k is just that it is cross compiled... > > http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.php?&pkg=gnu-smalltalk&ver=2.1.8-2&arch=m68k&stamp=1094298817&file=log&as=raw > > Indeed, genprims crashes when you try to execute it because it was not > compiled *on* a m68k, was it? > > I guess I will have to distribute prims.inl, vm.inl and friends. > > Paolo Well in c-c environments theres usually two separate CC's defined: one for the target platform and one for the local platform for during-build targets. Does genprims need to be executed on the target platform or during the build ? Rob -- GPG key available at: <http://www.robertcollins.net/keys.txt>.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ help-smalltalk mailing list help-smalltalk@xxxxxxx http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/help-smalltalk